As the last Tolkien fan in the world to have seen "The Hobbit 1", I wish to report my impressions, which are:
1. Martin Freeman and Richard Armitage are excellent as Bilbo and Thorin.
2. The dwarves are mostly good and not taken too far in the direction of comic relief, though I was worried in the Bag End scenes before Thorin appeared. Honourable mention to Ken Stott as a very likable Balin.
3. The depiction of Barry Humpries' Great Goblin as a distinctly different kind of orc to Azog was surprisingly effective in resolving/ bridging the differences between The Hobbit's goblins, who owe a heavy debt to George MacDonald, and the darker orcs of Lord of the Rings. I wasn't entirely convinced by the jowly prosthetics/ CGI, but that's a relatively minor point.
4. Jackson is getting as bad as George Lucas for self-indulgent lingering shots of Cool Stuff and completely implausible fight sequences.
5. I've no objection to backstory about the White Council appearing in the film, and it was particularly nice to see Christopher Lee reprising Sauruman, but Radagast and his bunny-driven sledge? Really? He's supposed to be Franciscan, not a complete loon... (and see above re: 'completely unbelievable fight/ chase sequences').
6. Excellent soundtrack, with good use of the Lord of the Rings leitmotivs, and a haunting new tune for the dwarves - and I did love the scene where they sing "Far Over Misty Mountains Cold" in Bag End.
I feel I enjoyed the evening and got my money's worth, but it's far too uneven to be called a good film, though there were aspects I did enjoy a lot.
1. Martin Freeman and Richard Armitage are excellent as Bilbo and Thorin.
2. The dwarves are mostly good and not taken too far in the direction of comic relief, though I was worried in the Bag End scenes before Thorin appeared. Honourable mention to Ken Stott as a very likable Balin.
3. The depiction of Barry Humpries' Great Goblin as a distinctly different kind of orc to Azog was surprisingly effective in resolving/ bridging the differences between The Hobbit's goblins, who owe a heavy debt to George MacDonald, and the darker orcs of Lord of the Rings. I wasn't entirely convinced by the jowly prosthetics/ CGI, but that's a relatively minor point.
4. Jackson is getting as bad as George Lucas for self-indulgent lingering shots of Cool Stuff and completely implausible fight sequences.
5. I've no objection to backstory about the White Council appearing in the film, and it was particularly nice to see Christopher Lee reprising Sauruman, but Radagast and his bunny-driven sledge? Really? He's supposed to be Franciscan, not a complete loon... (and see above re: 'completely unbelievable fight/ chase sequences').
6. Excellent soundtrack, with good use of the Lord of the Rings leitmotivs, and a haunting new tune for the dwarves - and I did love the scene where they sing "Far Over Misty Mountains Cold" in Bag End.
I feel I enjoyed the evening and got my money's worth, but it's far too uneven to be called a good film, though there were aspects I did enjoy a lot.