It's just too busy. It may have something to do with the fact that I have the attention span of a goldfish these days, but I really find it painful to look at. Let alone find anything.
I don't think it's a dreadful layout, but it seems more rough-edged than its predecessor, and it's very close to the online Times and Telegraph. I'd have preferred a more evolutionary approach to redesign, if one was necessary.
Well, yes, although I rather liked the very spare old format (at least for the front page: the tiny columns, whether or not intended as homage to a newspaper layout, made reading tiresome, at least if you read quickly. Perhaps it'll settle down, or I'll get used to it, but... not a fan, so far.
They did something similar to the Travel section a month or two back, with box sections etc. I stopped visiting it. I agree, it's messy and unclear like this. Grrr.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 03:39 pm (UTC)I could live with it looking like that - but where's all the news?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 04:04 pm (UTC)If it wasn't for the fact that it's the only one you can still access from abroad for free I wouldn't bother with it any more.
MM
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 05:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 04:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 05:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 04:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-10 09:11 pm (UTC)