My LJ bio. does point out that in an ideal world I'd be the (benevolent - optional) dictator of a small city state - I can certainly see the attraction of power, even in in this world I lack the motivation to acquire it!
I can well believe that INTJs have an affinity for cassocks. I do actually think that doing the test properly (which is about 200 questions, not 10, and much, much subtler, with no obvious way to twist it) can be a very worthwhile exercise. I might be influenced by the fact that having done it a couple of times, I always come out the same, and that the more detailed description of the 'type' I read, the more like me it is in pretty much every way. Not perhaps useful in a mundanely practical sense, but I've found it genuinely valuable in other ways.
(And I speak as someone who generally considers 'personality questionnaires' and types utter nonsense)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-26 05:01 pm (UTC)*Offers sympathy*
Date: 2006-06-26 05:05 pm (UTC)Oh dear. Bad day?
Re: *Offers sympathy*
Date: 2006-06-26 07:57 pm (UTC)BTW, the reason I deleted my last was that I realised it contained friendslocked information. Cheers E
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-26 06:32 pm (UTC)Packing is never any fun. Any and all distraction options are fair enough, I reckon!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 09:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-26 09:46 pm (UTC)Harry Potter Personality Quiz (http://piratemonkeysinc.com/quiz.htm) by Pirate Monkeys Inc. (http://piratemonkeysinc.com)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 09:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-27 08:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 09:03 am (UTC)I've come out as INTJ before, but I've never done a proper version of the test, so I'm not sure what I 'actually' am.
INTJ is very common among Anglican clergy, I'm told. Must have something to do with an affinity for cassocks!
power-crazed maniac
Date: 2006-06-29 01:39 pm (UTC)I can well believe that INTJs have an affinity for cassocks. I do actually think that doing the test properly (which is about 200 questions, not 10, and much, much subtler, with no obvious way to twist it) can be a very worthwhile exercise. I might be influenced by the fact that having done it a couple of times, I always come out the same, and that the more detailed description of the 'type' I read, the more like me it is in pretty much every way. Not perhaps useful in a mundanely practical sense, but I've found it genuinely valuable in other ways.
(And I speak as someone who generally considers 'personality questionnaires' and types utter nonsense)