Twitter-witter!
Dec. 10th, 2008 09:16 pm- 21:20 "A Nasa scientist [allegedly] commended The Clangers as a valiant attempt to bring a note of realism to the fantasy of the space programme." #
- 21:56 Delightful tribute here: tinyurl.com/6xjg77
With full eps of Ivor and Clangers! # - 22:00 Wah. where have all my c5 envelopes gone? (yes, I know: the post....) #
- 22:22 @pellegrina I'm sorry to hear of your loss- my condolences.... #
- 00:05 Note to self: buying a decent dressing gown ought to be the next priority.... #
- 09:27 Once, more, with head-desking: angels are not sexy, people. They are scary and unearthly and do not have 'curves in all the right places". #
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 09:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 11:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 11:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 10:13 pm (UTC)It's a shame, because angels are *awesome*, and there's so much potential for great art, but THAT WAS NOT IT.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-10 11:10 pm (UTC)But yeah, before making any angel art one ought to reflect, at length, on the fact that the first words out of their mouths is almost invariably 'Don't be afraid'. And if you have to tell someone not to be afraid, then that implies that you have reason to think they are (such as them being a small whimpering heap on the ground!)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-11 12:47 am (UTC)