Youtube linkage
Jun. 20th, 2007 04:24 pmJust seen the latests BBC teaser trailer: Is that really Anne Widecombe endorsing Harold Saxon? Eeep! (Could be viewed as a spoiler; also contains terrifying images of boy bands)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XZ0dNFYcjk
Really, I'm not sure which I find more worrying....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XZ0dNFYcjk
Really, I'm not sure which I find more worrying....
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:45 pm (UTC)I wonder what David Cameron thinks about the association of the Tories with renegade, murderous Timelords? (Or is it an insinuation that Tories are easily mind-controlled? - OK, enough cheap shots...)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:56 pm (UTC)Meanwhile... the Dead Ringers sketch brought back unhappy memories of the string of ill-advised appearances in light entertainment series Sylvester McCoy made in character when he was playing the Doctor, but David Tennant manages such a good Jon Culshaw-as-Tony Blair that my anxieties were at least allayed. My scepticism about the current prime minister's state of mind is such that I could almost believe that he does think that he has saved the world from the Daleks. In forty-five minutes, of course.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:33 pm (UTC)I hope Tennant won't make a habit of doing light entertainment IC, but he was really good as Jon Culshaw's Blair ("New Labour... That's weird!" "Last of the time lords gesture!")
I'm beginning to think Blair thinks he's the Messiah, never mind a Time Lord...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:53 pm (UTC)Cheap tactic on Saxon's part, or on the show's part? Personally I found Widdecombe's appearance really creepy in a good way, as it brings that world even closer to our own world. Of course, Widdecombe herself is enough to give anyone a chill!
In the real world I think she's more likely to be able to torpedo the chances of candidates ("something of the night," anyone?) than to be able to achieve anything by an endorsement, but hey, you have to make allowances for dramatic license.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:23 pm (UTC)The choice of Ann Widdecombe is an odd one, in part for the reasons you describe... but then, I suppose that if she trusts Saxon, in the wake of her 'something of the night' comment about Michael Howard, then he must be a good thing. I wonder if Saxon is set up as a sort of British Pim Fortuyn?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 06:55 pm (UTC)I wonder if Saxon is set up as a sort of British Pim Fortuyn?
That's kind of the impression that I'm getting. But it does seem odd that she would agree to endorse someone who is so obviously on the Wrong Side.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 07:34 pm (UTC)I think we are on the same page, if perhaps on different paragraphs. Andrew Marr lent some credibility to a crude set-up.
It is odd that Ann Widdecombe is endorsing someone who will be set up to be evil - does she have a newspaper column anywhere, which would allow her to explain it?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:43 pm (UTC)I suspect that we've seen most, if not all, of the contributions of Ms Osbourne, McFly and Ms Widdecombe to the episode in the trailers.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:36 pm (UTC)I could be wrong, it could be a coincindence, but it does seem strange.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:41 pm (UTC)Not sure what we should make of this, except possibly that the Master spent his years of humanity catching up with repeats of classic Who....
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:55 pm (UTC)I remember one reviewer saying that the Delgado Master's advantage over Pertwee's Doctor is that the Master knows that he's in a television programme, though I'd argue that it's often the other way round.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:53 pm (UTC)Whereas --.. .. is either Z I or MH depending on how you break it up, and I don't think is intended to be meaningful.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 04:59 pm (UTC)Yes, I'm sure that this is the case.
Whereas --.. .. is either Z I or MH depending on how you break it up, and I don't think is intended to be meaningful.
MH could be 'Master here!', I suppose.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:02 pm (UTC)MM
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:17 pm (UTC)(Still, it could be worse. They weren't New Who's most embarassing monster, at least.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:24 pm (UTC)Then who were...?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 05:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-20 10:36 pm (UTC)