Uses the poll feature!

[tree_and_leaf]

[Poll #971622]

Comments

[sacred-sarcasm.livejournal.com]

I'd choose something between the first two options (I ticked the first, in the end).

It was probably the best episode of this series, I think, give or a take a few flaws (annoying accents, and the tiresomely predictable appearance of Daleks - but I quite like the Daleks, so that's ok), and I'd certainly tune in for next week's. I expect it'll be quite easy to follow without having seen the first part, though.

[snorkackcatcher]

I basically only caught the last fifteen minutes or so myself -- it looked like a good one, and you probably want to at least find a summary of it before watching next time as there was a Significant Development at the end of the episode.

[helflaed.livejournal.com]

Worth watching. The next episode promises to be better (going by our fmaily standard of the more monsters the better, especially murderous sink plunger weilding creatures)

[nineveh-uk.livejournal.com]

To be honest, this week's RAdio Times cover probably tells you everything you actually need to know to cope with next week's episode.

[tree_and_leaf]

I shall make an effort to tune in, but I've got a friend staying, so it partly depends on her.

[tree_and_leaf]

I've had a poke around on LJ - it looks interesting. Not sure I believe the claims about the brilliance of the score = I'm not convinced by Murray Gold, and bitterly regret that they no longer use the odd minimalist electronic stuff of Old Who (at least you could hear the dialogue then!)

[tree_and_leaf]

There's nothing like a Dalek, when all's said and done. Course, that's probably a good thing....

[tree_and_leaf]

Yes - of course, I missed it, and it's pobably too late now - although there's probably links to it somewhere on LJ...