It is, rather. I haven't read Dawkins' book yet, but Eagleton is a fine critic without any obvious ideological axe to grind (I don't know if his name's familiar, but he's one of the most prominent Marxist literary critics/ theorists), so I'm inclinded to trust him.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-22 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-22 12:35 pm (UTC)