(no subject)
Mar. 15th, 2006 08:34 pmThe moon out there is as big as a penny, and somewhat copper coloured. My American flatmates, especially the ones from the no-drinking and modesty rule college are discussing whether or not this means the apocalypse.
Personally, I think
(a): if that's supposed to be blood coloured, I'm not impressed. God, however, is not an artistic slouch. This suggests there's some other reason.
(b): I'm not going to get really worried unless a wolf eats the sun...
Personally, I think
(a): if that's supposed to be blood coloured, I'm not impressed. God, however, is not an artistic slouch. This suggests there's some other reason.
(b): I'm not going to get really worried unless a wolf eats the sun...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 08:49 pm (UTC)O RLY? SRSLY?!?
I'm not going to get really worried unless a wolf eats the sun...
About two weeks ago, when it wouldn't stop snowing, I was convinced that the Fimbulwinter had come...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 08:51 pm (UTC)Fraid so... Course, I'm not sure how serious they are. I was a bit scared I might find out, so I retired upstairs, where I am working.
Er, right, sure I am.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 09:02 pm (UTC)And 'course you're working. Just like me, who's only having a quick look at her e-mails. (I.e. I logged in almost two hours ago. Eeek!)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 09:00 pm (UTC)Are they Wheaton folks or something else?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 09:16 pm (UTC)And you're right: it is a very pretty colour :)
Though I did have a fit of geekery and think 'Hm, might be scatter off atmospheric dust (cf harvest moon), what could be causing it...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 09:53 pm (UTC)Then there is the forthcoming apocalypse, obviously. No, no, I mean equinox!! Hahaha.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 10:02 pm (UTC)The moon doesn't change its solid arc as viewed from the Earth to any significant degree. That it looks larger when closer to the ground isn't atmospheric distortion, as is sometimes claimed; it's purely an optical illusion.
I suppose this is a good thing; optical illusions are more personal than atmospheric phenomena. The wind is the result of impersonal temperature gradients, while an optical illusion is a quirk related very much to the human condition and the quirks of brain circuitry. Funny that for millenia people have tried to anthropomorphize the wind as a thinking, feeling god whilst they have tried to write off optical illusions as unimportant parlor tricks.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 10:08 pm (UTC)Not that I know anything about it :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-15 10:21 pm (UTC)I've never heard of an optical illusion that distorts colors, save after images. They may exist though...
(begins to scour google)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-16 09:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-16 05:53 pm (UTC)A very reasonable attitude! I think I'd be pretty concerned if I saw a wolf eating the sun! And no, I don't think flapping at it with a dishcloth and shouting "shoo!" would help much!
Also, what's a "modesty rule"? Sounds very sinister and patriarchal!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-17 12:20 am (UTC)Doesn't seem to apply to blokes, oddly enough.