tree_and_leaf: Francis Urquhart facing viewer, edge of face trimmed off, caption "I couldn't possibly comment" (couldn't possibly comment)
tree_and_leaf ([personal profile] tree_and_leaf) wrote2011-09-05 01:22 pm

(no subject)

While I'd quite like to believe this (who doesn't love a story about kids fighting for the right to read what they want?) I find it hard to believe that a Roman Catholic school* would ban some of these. I mean, admittedly you might censor Paradise Lost, because its Christology is certainly very dubious, but getting upset about works on human evolution is more of a fundamentalist Protestant thing, and I can't imagine why any school that didn't have a Stalinist axe to grind would want to ban Animal Farm.

But.... Dante? I'm not buying it without considerably more substantiation.



* The OP doesn't specify what kind of 'strict private school' they attend, but states that "most of the books contained information that opposed Catholicism".
liadnan: (Default)

[personal profile] liadnan 2011-09-05 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I always have problems with "necessary"
tigerfort: the Stripey Captain, with a bat friend perched on her head keeping her ears warm (Default)

[personal profile] tigerfort 2011-09-05 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
It is necessary for all vicars to wear one collar and two socks, although on occasion they may instead use two collars and one sock.
kerravonsen: Jack O'Neill: Excuse me? I think you'll find that the number of the SUBJECT determines the number of the VERB. (grammar)

[personal profile] kerravonsen 2011-09-05 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I have problems with BOTH "necessary" AND "bureaucracy"!